Statements:(i) Lady's Finger is tastier than cabbage.(ii) Cauliflower is tastier than Lady's Finger.(iii) Cabbage is not tastier than peas.

Question

Option 1: Peas are as tasty as lady's finger

Option 2: Peas are as tasty as cauliflower and lady's finger

Option 3: Peas is not tastier than lady's finger

Option 4: Cauliflower is tastier than cabbage

AfterBoards · Accepted Answer

Let us say that the tastier dish is "greater". We have these 3 statements:(i) LF > Cab(ii) Cau > LF(iii) Cab ≤ P can say: > LF > Cab (and) P ≥ Cab<hr> 1 -> Can't be determined. P and LF are tastier than Cab, but no relationship between them. 2 -> Cau is tastier than LF, hence this option falls apart. 3 -> No relationship between P and LF 4 -> Correct. We clearly see that Cau > LF > Cab.

IPMAT Rohtak 2019 (LR) PYQs

Statements:
(i) Lady's Finger is tastier than cabbage. $\newline$ (ii) Cauliflower is tastier than Lady's Finger. $\newline$ (iii) Cabbage is not tastier than peas.

IPMAT Rohtak 2019 (LR) PYQs

Statements:(i) Lady's Finger is tastier than cabbage.\newline(ii) Cauliflower is tastier than Lady's Finger.\newline(iii) Cabbage is not tastier than peas.

Keyboard Shortcuts

Statements:
(i) Lady's Finger is tastier than cabbage. $\newline$ (ii) Cauliflower is tastier than Lady's Finger. $\newline$ (iii) Cabbage is not tastier than peas.